|
Post by kime on Jun 4, 2010 13:33:38 GMT -5
The kills should be Reflection and Shushnik, and the Burnage kill can go on kime or Sabs.
|
|
|
Post by kime on Jun 4, 2010 13:36:08 GMT -5
Loser what did we just say about suspicious votes
That is hella suspicious
|
|
|
Post by teucrian on Jun 4, 2010 15:16:14 GMT -5
Sorry guys. That's what I get for making Infidel's gut itch. You live and you learn, I suppose. Ah well. Mighty fast bandwagon there.
I voted for Shushnik because he's been acting bizarrely in thread and he loses his shit when you vote for him. But I actually didn't know he was a special, seems pretty likely now. Bad play by me.
|
|
|
Post by teucrian on Jun 4, 2010 15:20:00 GMT -5
You know, it occurred to me while I was voting for Shushnik yesterday: I should mention Ronrab here, just in case. Then I said, nahh, don't know what to say about it without seeming suspicious.
|
|
|
Post by rainbowsoda on Jun 4, 2010 15:21:48 GMT -5
Everybody else, vote as if you were a villager and weren't reading this. I always vote this way anyway. My votes so far: B:l -> obligatory grudge vote T_R -> he voted for me schaomidsasiofjaiojaf (whoever doubted the OS reveal) -> Why wouldn't I vote for someone questioning Orange Soda's authority or validity, and I would definitely vote for someone that didn't know the Game Theory meme or what the color green means... I'll do the same today with my vote, but I won't be able to catch up until after my test at 7:30 though, so expect a late vote from me.
|
|
Ebfan
New Member
Seriously?
Posts: 43
|
Post by Ebfan on Jun 4, 2010 15:26:41 GMT -5
Well, I'm going to be out until probably tomorrow morning. Good luck guys.
|
|
|
Post by rainbowsoda on Jun 4, 2010 15:31:29 GMT -5
I don't see you surviving this vote, i'm going to vote for you and cast some suspicion on Law for voting for T_R
|
|
|
Post by teucrian on Jun 4, 2010 15:32:55 GMT -5
Oh no, I'm almost certain to die. Might as well give it a little go though.
|
|
|
Post by thorgot on Jun 4, 2010 15:34:38 GMT -5
Hold on, if I were a vigilante I would be all but certain kime is good (having voted for mafia both days).
Why are we killing him with our good kill?
Also, I figured out a way to get around the fact that B:L seers as a villager. Have him claim to be part of a network with the vigilante!
|
|
|
Post by teucrian on Jun 4, 2010 15:35:10 GMT -5
By the way, if they ask who I am, I'll say Plutonium and that I don't know who that is. Might as well give them the notion that we don't have cover roles.
|
|
|
Post by kime on Jun 4, 2010 15:45:58 GMT -5
Hold on, if I were a vigilante I would be all but certain kime is good (having voted for mafia both days). Why are we killing him with our good kill? Also, I figured out a way to get around the fact that B:L seers as a villager. Have him claim to be part of a network with the vigilante! That would only work if there is no network left. We gotta hit the seer, preferrably after he seers me. As for kime, kime is always evil. He threw two mafia under the bus to make himself less evil!
|
|
|
Post by teucrian on Jun 4, 2010 15:46:53 GMT -5
If ya'll want, I could contact Infidel and claim to be Plutonium, the village busdriver.
It won't get the vote off of me, but they may come to the conclusion that we both don't have cover roles and won't be able to busdrive anymore. Since we still will be able to do some busdriving it may cause some confusion.
|
|
|
Post by kime on Jun 4, 2010 15:54:32 GMT -5
I would advise against it.
Letting them know that the mafia controls a bus drive can make Aegis more suspicious in the long run, especially if an ability is targetted at him.
|
|
|
Post by rainbowsoda on Jun 4, 2010 15:57:47 GMT -5
Oh no, I'm almost certain to die. Might as well give it a little go though. Contact rainfall IMO
|
|
|
Post by teucrian on Jun 4, 2010 15:58:28 GMT -5
Good deal. Ah well, good luck my friends. Time to pack it in and try again next time.
|
|